If freedom of speech is absolute, how come it's not applied...

Insider trading

Fraud

You have freedom of speech. If I loan you my computer, I can tell you not to use it for certain things, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.

Why are perceived or real slights interpreted as rejections and reality by pwBPD?

Freedom of speech does not apply to:

Child pornography

Threats of violence

Billy Joel attempted suicide twice and fell into coma after affair with friend's wife - KOMO

No freedom is absolute.

You have freedom to travel. If I loan you my car, I can tell you not to take it out of town, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.

That’s what it is. You have no right to use other people’s stuff. If people let you use their stuff, they can tell you how you can use it, and they can tell you to stop using it any time they want.

The World Ends with You Director Tatsuya Kando Leaves Square Enix - Anime News Network

HIPAA violations

Revealing classified information

Trade secrets

Italy citizenship referendum polarises country - BBC

And much, much more.

False advertising

Conspiracy

James Bond game 007 First Light gets first trailer - The Verge

If you’re wondering why free speech doesn’t apply to the internet, it’s because you have no right to use other people’s stuff for free.

Terroristic threats

Perjury